Davis v. Wilson County, Tennessee

Filing 74

ORDER: Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 69 and Objections filed by the Defendant 70 . The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of t he Defendant are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant's Second Motion to Dismiss 29 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/27/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

HAROLD B. DAVIS
v.
WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE

)
)
) NO. 3-13-0238
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 69) and Objections filed by the Defendant (Docket No. 70).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the
Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The
Objections of the Defendant are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and
approved.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Second Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 29) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE