City of Hendersonville, Tennessee v. American Southern Insurance Company et al
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Because Mansker Farms is a Tennessee LLC, its presence in this case destroys diversity jurisdiction. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Remand to State Court Docket No. 7 is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court For Sumner County, Tennessee, from which it was removed. Defendant American's Motion to Drop Dispensable Party Docket No. 10 is DENIED, and its Motion to Enlarge Removal Period Docket No. 9 is DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/26/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER. Copy mailed to Circuit Court Clerk for Sumner County, Tennesse by regular mail.)(la)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE, TENNESSEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN SOUTHERN INSURANCE
COMPANY and MANSKER FARMS, LLC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 3:13-0249
Judge Trauger
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
The plaintiff has filed a Motion to Remand to State Court (Docket No. 7), to which
defendant American Southern Insurance Company (“American”) has responded in opposition
(Docket No. 8). Also pending are defendant American’s Motion to Enlarge the Removal Period
(Docket No. 9), to which the plaintiff has responded in opposition (Docket No. 14), and
defendant American’s Motion to Drop Dispensable Party (Docket No. 10), to which the plaintiff
has responded in opposition (Docket No. 13).
The Motion to Remand asserts that the Notice of Removal (Docket No. 1) was filed one
day beyond the deadline and that the assertion that defendant Mansker Farms, LLC (“Mansker”)
is not a real party in interest is without merit. If Mansker is a dispensable party, then dropping it
from the case will remove the impediment to this court’s diversity jurisdiction.
The initial arguments made by American as to defendant Mansker related to the fact that
Mansker had been administratively dissolved as an LLC and could not be sued. This assertion
appears to be in error, given that T.C.A. § 48-245-305(b)(2) provides that the “termination of
LLC existence [by administrative dissolution] shall not take away or impair any remedy to or
1
against the LLC or its members, governors, or managers for any right or claim existing or any
liability incurred prior to such termination. Any such action or proceeding by or against the LLC
may be prosecuted or defended by the LLC in its LLC name.” Regardless, the record reflects
that the Secretary of State has reinstated Mansker and changed its status back to “active” as of
May 8, 2013. (Docket No. 15, Ex. A)
The court must determine, however, if Mansker is a proper defendant against whom valid
claims have been made by the plaintiff. Defendant American asserts that “the thrust of
Plaintiff’s Complaint is ASIC’s alleged liability under the Bonds, not the liability of Mansker
Farms, LLC, which is dissolved and no longer extant.” (Docket No. 1 at 2) To the contrary, the
City of Hendersonville has sued Mansker for its failure to properly complete required
improvements on a subdivision located in Hendersonville, Tennessee and has also sued
defendant American, which issued bonds to secure the completion of the subdivision by
Mansker. (Complaint, Docket No. 1, Ex. A, ¶4) Moreover, the performance bonds attached to
the Complaint supporting its allegations make both American and Mansker Farms jointly liable
for non-performance. For these reasons, clearly Mansker Farms is a proper defendant in this
case.
Because Mansker Farms is a Tennessee LLC, its presence in this case destroys diversity
jurisdiction. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Remand to State Court (Docket No.
7) is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court For Sumner County,
Tennessee, from which it was removed. Defendant American’s Motion to Drop Dispensable
Party (Docket No. 10) is DENIED, and its Motion to Enlarge Removal Period (Docket No. 9) is
DENIED AS MOOT.
2
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 26th day of June 2013.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?