The Adam Group, Inc. of Middle Tennessee v. Tunnell et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 19 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/15/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
THE ADAM GROUP, INC. OF MIDDLE
TENNESSEE, D/B/A PLAYMAKER CRM
Plaintiff
v.
DANIEL CHRISTOPHER TUNNELL,
KEAGAN BROWN, ANNIE TUNNELL
MCDANIEL, AND KARL DUMAS
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No.

3:13-CV-00258-TCB

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendants Daniel Christopher Tunnell, Keagan Brown, Annie Tunnell McDaniel, and Karl
Dumas (collectively referred to herein as “Defendants”), pursuant to LR 7.01, respectfully request
that the Court grant leave for Defendants to file a Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Dismiss
(Doc. 9). As grounds for this Motion, Defendants state as follows:
1.

On April 11, 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in

Support (Doc. 9 and Doc. 10 respectively).
2.

Plaintiff The Adam Group, Inc. of Middle Tennessee, d/b/a Playmaker CRM

(hereinafter “Playmaker”) filed an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on April 29, 2013
(Doc. 18).
3.

LR 7.01 provides in pertinent part that “A reply memorandum may be filed upon

leave of Court.” LR 7.01(b). The Court has not yet set a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss.
Defendants are simply trying to ensure that all issues are properly briefed prior to any hearing on the
Motion to Dismiss and several issues were raised in the Opposition that bear comment by