The Adam Group, Inc. of Middle Tennessee v. Tunnell et al

Filing 62

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 9 is hereby DENIED. This case is returned to Magistrate Judge Knowles for further pretrial management and consideration of the outstanding discovery motions (Docket Nos. 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 48 & 55). Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/19/14. (dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
THE ADAM GROUP, INC. OF MIDDLE
TENNESSEE, d/b/a PLAYMAKER CRM,
Plaintiff,
v.
DANIEL CHRISTOPHER TUNNELL,
KEAGAN BROWN, ANNIE TUNNELL
McDANIEL, and KARL DUMAS,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:13-00258
Judge Sharp

ORDER
For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss (Docket No. 9) is hereby DENIED. This case is returned to Magistrate Judge Knowles for
further pretrial management and consideration of the outstanding discovery motions (Docket Nos.
33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 48 & 55).
It is SO ORDERED.

_____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE