Pearl Corporation et al v. Randall May International, Inc.

Filing 44

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiffs' Motion To Strike 31 is DENIED, and Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Or Transfer 21 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The request to dismiss is DENIED, and t he request to transfer is GRANTED. Accordingly, this action is TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, as related to the pending case of Randall May International, Inc. v. Pearl Corp., and Pearl Musical Instrument Co., Case No. SACV13-00016 JVS (RNBx). Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/6/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION PEARL CORPORATION, et al. v. RANDALL MAY INTERNATIONAL, INC. ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:13-0279 JUDGE CAMPBELL ORDER Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Or Transfer (Docket No. 21) and Plaintiffs’ Motion To Strike (Docket No. 31). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiffs’ Motion To Strike (Docket No. 31) is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Or Transfer (Docket No. 21) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The request to dismiss is DENIED, and the request to transfer is GRANTED. Accordingly, this action is TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, as related to the pending case of Randall May International, Inc. v. Pearl Corp., and Pearl Musical Instrument Co., Case No. SACV13-00016 JVS (RNBx). IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?