Harmer et al v. Colom et al

Filing 57

ORDER: This matter is before the Court upon "Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Motion for Telephonic Hearing 39 ." Docket No. 42 (underlining in original). The Court has denied as moot the Motion for Telephonic Hearing. Docket No. 56 . Therefore, the instant Motion to Strike is also DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/21/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

PETER S. HARMER, et ux
CHRISTINE C. HARMER,
Plaintiffs,

vs.

WILBUR O. COLOM; and
THE COLOM LAW FIRM, LLC,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 3:13-0286
) JUDGE SHARP/KNOWLES
)
) JURY DEMAND
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion for
Telephonic Hearing (Doc. 39).” Docket No. 42 (underlining in original). The Court has denied
as moot the Motion for Telephonic Hearing. Docket No. 56. Therefore, the instant Motion to
Strike is also DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

E. Clifton Knowles
United States Magistrate Judge