Schenck et al v. Orosz et al
Filing
44
ORDER granting 42 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/9/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Motion GRANTED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
RUSSELL SCHENCK and BETHANY
PRIMROSE d/b/a INSOMNIAC ARTS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CALE OROSZ and CASE DOODLE,
LLC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:13-cv-294
Judge Trauger
Magistrate Judge Griffin
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Their Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs’ Response to
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint Pursuant to LR 7.01(b)
Now come the Defendants CALE OROSZ and CASE DOODLE, LLC, and herby move
for leave to file their Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b).
.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: July 9, 2013
Local Counsel
Richard G. Sanders (Tenn. BPR No. 23875)
Aaron & Sanders, PLLC
11 Lea Ave., Suite 606
Nashville, TN 37210
(615) 734–1188
Fax (615) 250–9807
rick@aaronsanderslaw.com
docket@aaronsanderslaw.com
Local Counsel for Defendants
/s/ Christopher J. McGeehan
.
Christopher J. McGeehan (admitted pro hac vice)
McGeehan Technology Law, Ltd.
4128 N Clarendon Ave #220
Chicago, IL 60613
(872) 221-0970
chris@newidealaw.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?