Schenck et al v. Orosz et al

Filing 44

ORDER granting 42 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/9/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
Motion GRANTED. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RUSSELL SCHENCK and BETHANY PRIMROSE d/b/a INSOMNIAC ARTS, Plaintiffs, v. CALE OROSZ and CASE DOODLE, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:13-cv-294 Judge Trauger Magistrate Judge Griffin Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Their Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint Pursuant to LR 7.01(b) Now come the Defendants CALE OROSZ and CASE DOODLE, LLC, and herby move for leave to file their Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b). . Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 9, 2013 Local Counsel Richard G. Sanders (Tenn. BPR No. 23875) Aaron & Sanders, PLLC 11 Lea Ave., Suite 606 Nashville, TN 37210 (615) 734–1188 Fax (615) 250–9807 rick@aaronsanderslaw.com docket@aaronsanderslaw.com Local Counsel for Defendants /s/ Christopher J. McGeehan . Christopher J. McGeehan (admitted pro hac vice) McGeehan Technology Law, Ltd. 4128 N Clarendon Ave #220 Chicago, IL 60613 (872) 221-0970 chris@newidealaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?