Jordan v. Social Security Administration

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's Motion and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner. This Order terminates this Court's jurisdiction over the above- styled action, and the case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 9/27/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LEILA JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )   No. 3:13-cv-00338 Judge Nixon Magistrate Judge Bryant ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with Remand to Defendant (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 15), filed along with a Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 16). Defendant states that remand is “appropriate in this case for the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to reevaluate the evidence of record.” (Doc. No. 16 at 1.) Specifically, the ALJ is to determine whether the disability rating of the VA is entitled to great weight, and provide valid reasons for the weight given if not. (Id.) Defendant indicates that Plaintiff’s counsel has been contacted and has no objection to Defendant’s Motion. (Doc. No. 15.) The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner. This Order terminates this Court’s jurisdiction over the above-styled action, and the case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Entered this the 27th day of September, 2013. ________________________________ JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?