Driver v. Sator et al

Filing 68

ORDER: Before the court is the plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 57 ) to Magistrate Judge Cliff Knowles' July 2, 2013 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (ECF No. 40 ), in which Magistrate Judge Knowles recommends denying the plai ntiff's Motion for Temporary Injunction (ECF No. 26 ). As set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, the court has considered de novo the portions of the R&R to which objections are lodged and finds no error in the magistrate judge 9;s findings of fact or conclusions of law. The plaintiff's objections are therefore OVERRULED; the R&R is ACCEPTED; and the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 26 ) is DENIED. This matter remains REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Knowles. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/3/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

JERRY LYNN DRIVER,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. PAUL ALEXANDER et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:13-cv-364
Judge Trauger

ORDER
Before the court is the plaintiff’s Objection (ECF No. 57) to Magistrate Judge Cliff Knowles’ July 2,
2013 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF No. 40), in which Magistrate Judge Knowles
recommends denying the plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Injunction (ECF No. 26).
As set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, the court has considered de novo the
portions of the R&R to which objections are lodged and finds no error in the magistrate judge’s findings of
fact or conclusions of law. The plaintiff’s objections are therefore OVERRULED; the R&R is ACCEPTED;
and the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 26) is DENIED.
This matter remains REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Knowles.
It is so ORDERED.

Aleta A. Trauger
United States District Judge