Mihnovich et al v. Williamson County Board of Education et al
Filing
35
ORDER: The Court deems the agreed order to be a stipulation of dismissal and, as such, no further action on the part of the Court is required in accord with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the plaintiffs clai ms against defendants John Does 1-31 are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to terminate John Does 1-31 as defendants in this case. John Does 1-31 terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/8/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
TRACY MIHNOVICH and JAMES
MIHNOVICH, individually and as next
friends for N.M., a minor child
v.
WILLIAMSON COUNTY BOARD OF
EDUCATION; and JOHN DOES 1-31
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3-13-0379
ORDER
In accord with the order entered March 24, 2014 (Docket Entry No. 31), the parties filed an
agreed order on April 10, 2014, reflecting that the plaintiffs do not intend to amend their complaint
to join any John Doe defendants and that therefore the parties have agreed that the claims against
defendants John Does 1-31 should be dismissed with prejudice.
The Court deems the agreed order to be a stipulation of dismissal and, as such, no further
action on the part of the Court is required in accord with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the plaintiffs claims against defendants John Does 1-31 are hereby
DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to terminate John Does 1-31 as defendants in
this case.
It is so ORDERED.
JULIET GRIFFIN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?