Mihnovich et al v. Williamson County Board of Education et al

Filing 35

ORDER: The Court deems the agreed order to be a stipulation of dismissal and, as such, no further action on the part of the Court is required in accord with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the plaintiffs clai ms against defendants John Does 1-31 are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to terminate John Does 1-31 as defendants in this case. John Does 1-31 terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/8/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TRACY MIHNOVICH and JAMES MIHNOVICH, individually and as next friends for N.M., a minor child v. WILLIAMSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; and JOHN DOES 1-31 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3-13-0379 ORDER In accord with the order entered March 24, 2014 (Docket Entry No. 31), the parties filed an agreed order on April 10, 2014, reflecting that the plaintiffs do not intend to amend their complaint to join any John Doe defendants and that therefore the parties have agreed that the claims against defendants John Does 1-31 should be dismissed with prejudice. The Court deems the agreed order to be a stipulation of dismissal and, as such, no further action on the part of the Court is required in accord with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the plaintiffs claims against defendants John Does 1-31 are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to terminate John Does 1-31 as defendants in this case. It is so ORDERED. JULIET GRIFFIN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?