Morris v. Genspring Family Offices, LLC et al

Filing 44

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court DENIES summary judgment as to whether Plaintiff's right to a single incentive award was contingent on his following Defendant's administrative process to trigger such a payment, but GRANTS summary judgment as to all other issues. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/13/14. (dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JOHN MORRIS
Plaintiff,
v.
GENSPRING FAMILY OFFICES, LLC
and SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:13-cv-389
Judge Sharp

ORDER
For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court DENIES
summary judgment as to whether Plaintiff’s right to a single incentive award was contingent on
his following Defendant’s administrative process to trigger such a payment, but GRANTS
summary judgment as to all other issues.
It is SO ORDERED.

_________________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

1