United States of America v. Moore
Filing
13
ORDER granting 12 MOTION to Continue CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference is continued to 12/30/2013 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 11/15/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY K. MOORE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER:
Motion granted. The Initial
Case Mgt Conference is
continued to December 30,
2013 at 10:30 a.m.
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Civil Action No. 3:13–cv-00494
SENIOR JUDGE JOHN T. NIXON
Magistrate Judge Clifton E. Knowles
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Comes now the Plaintiff, by and through the United States Attorney for the Middle District
of Tennessee, and respectfully requests that the initial case management conference in this action
currently set for November 25, 2013, be rescheduled for a date on or after December 16, 2013.
This is a suit filed by the United States on May 23, 2013, to collect on medical student
loan debt owed by the Defendant. The initial case management conference was set for July 22,
2013. The date, by order of this Court, was moved to September 17, 2013, then to October
29, 2013 and finally to November 25, 2013.
The United States Department of Health and Human Services is preparing a litigation
report in response to Defendant’s letter to that agency requesting administrative relief from the
debt. The attorney preparing the report has requested a continuance to a date on or after
December 16, 2013 in order to prepare the report.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff respectfully moves that the initial case management conference be
set for a date on or after December 16, 2013, allowing time for the Department of Health and
Human Services to prepare a litigation report.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?