United States of America v. Moore

Filing 13

ORDER granting 12 MOTION to Continue CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference is continued to 12/30/2013 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 11/15/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY K. MOORE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER: Motion granted. The Initial Case Mgt Conference is continued to December 30, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. U.S. Magistrate Judge Civil Action No. 3:13–cv-00494 SENIOR JUDGE JOHN T. NIXON Magistrate Judge Clifton E. Knowles PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Comes now the Plaintiff, by and through the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee, and respectfully requests that the initial case management conference in this action currently set for November 25, 2013, be rescheduled for a date on or after December 16, 2013. This is a suit filed by the United States on May 23, 2013, to collect on medical student loan debt owed by the Defendant. The initial case management conference was set for July 22, 2013. The date, by order of this Court, was moved to September 17, 2013, then to October 29, 2013 and finally to November 25, 2013. The United States Department of Health and Human Services is preparing a litigation report in response to Defendant’s letter to that agency requesting administrative relief from the debt. The attorney preparing the report has requested a continuance to a date on or after December 16, 2013 in order to prepare the report. Accordingly, the Plaintiff respectfully moves that the initial case management conference be set for a date on or after December 16, 2013, allowing time for the Department of Health and Human Services to prepare a litigation report.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?