Marcus v. The Farm at Natchez Trace, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER: Telephone conference held on 1/27/14. Counsel for the Plaintiff called in at the appointed time set in Docket Entry 15. Unfortunately, counsel forthe Defendant did not call in. Counsel for the Defendant should file with the Court a brief explanation for the miscue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 1/27/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
KAREN MARCUS,

)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
)
THE FARM AT NATCHEZ TRACE, INC., )
)
Defendant
)

No. 3:13-0498
Judge Campbell/Brown
Jury Demand

O R D E R
A brief telephone conference was held in this matter on
January 27, 2014. Counsel for the Plaintiff called in at the
appointed time set in Docket Entry 15. Unfortunately, counsel for
the Defendant did not call in. Counsel for the Defendant should
file with the Court a brief explanation for the miscue.
Counsel for the Plaintiff advised that she had some
outstanding discovery requests from September that had not yet been
responded to, but that she did not anticipate any difficulty with
the scheduling order. She said that she did need to schedule some
depositions with opposing counsel. Plaintiff’s counsel should
promptly notify the Magistrate Judge if there are difficulties in
securing discovery and scheduling the deposition and the Magistrate
Judge

will

conduct

a

further

conference

about

the

matter.

Plaintiff’s counsel further advised that she believed there would
be only one plaintiff in this matter.
The Magistrate Judge advises both parties that he stands
ready to assist with alternative dispute resolution at their
request at any point.

It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Joe B. Brown
JOE B. BROWN
United States Magistrate Judge

2