Doubleday v. Social Security Administration
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the 29 Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES 15 Plaintiff's Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of t he Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 10/14/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JESSICA D. DOUBLEDAY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
No. 3:13-cv-00524
Judge Nixon
Magistrate Judge Frensley
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jessica A. Doubleday’s Motion for Judgment Based
Upon the Administrative Record (“Motion”). (Doc. No. 15.) Defendant Commissioner of Social
Security filed a Response opposing the Motion. (Doc. No. 19.) Subsequently, Magistrate Judge
Knowles issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion
be denied and the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. (Doc. No. 29 at p. 1.) The Report
was filed on September 12, 2016, and provided a period of fourteen days in which either party
could file an objection. (Id. at p. 40.) Neither party has filed an objection to date.
Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS
it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion and AFFIRMS the
decision of the Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.
It is so ORDERED.
Entered this the 14th day of October, 2016.
________________________________
JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?