Majors v. Sexton

Filing 10

ORDER: Respondent is DIRECTED to file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the petition within 60 days of the date of entry of this order. The respondent also is directed to file a complete copy of the documents referenced in Rule 5(c) and (d) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the petition and this order on the respondent and the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/2/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. Respondent & AG of TN petition and order by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CRAIG O. MAJORS, Petitioner, v. DAVID SEXTON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:13-cv-00543 Judge Campbell ORDER Petitioner Craig O. Majors, a state prisoner incarcerated at the Northeast Correctional Complex in Mountain City, Tennessee, has filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the judgment entered against him and the sentence imposed by the Montgomery County Circuit Court in 2008. (ECF No. 1.) The $5.00 filing fee has been paid in full. As it is not apparent from the petition that the petitioner is not entitled to relief, Rule 4, Rules Gov’g § 2254 Cases, the respondent is DIRECTED to file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the petition in accordance with Rule 5, Rules Gov’g § 2254 Cases, within 60 days of the date of entry of this order. The respondent also is directed to file a complete copy of the documents referenced in Rule 5(c) and (d) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the petition and this order on the respondent and the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee. Rule 4, Rules Gov’g § 2254 Cases. It is so ORDERED. Todd Campbell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?