May v. Apricus Biosciences, Inc. et al

Filing 52

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket Entry No. 24 ) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, P laintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 33 ) is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a separate judgment in accordance with Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/30/2014. (hb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
JACOB MAY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
APRICUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.,
)
KLEANTHIS XANTHOPOLOUS, Ph.D., )
PAUL V. MAIER,
)
DEIRDRE V. GILLESPIE, M.D.,
)
LEONARD OPPENHEIM, ESQ.,
)
RUST RAY, and JOHN DOES 1-3,
)
)
Defendants.
)

No. 3:13-cv-00554
Judge Sharp
Magistrate Judge Bryant

ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docket Entry No. 24) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s
Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to
Amend the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 33) is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a separate judgment in accordance with Rule 58(a)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is SO ORDERED.

_________________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE