Jackson v. Social Security Administration et al

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: After a de novo review of the record, the Unopposed Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 40 ) is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 31-1) is DENIED. The fina l decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/31/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION SHARON DELOIS JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:13-cv-00692 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 40), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 31-1) be denied and the final decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. After being granted an extension of time until September 28, 2017 to file objections, Plaintiff did not file any. (Doc. No. 42.) After a de novo review of the record, the Unopposed Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 40) is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 31-1) is DENIED. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?