Jackson v. Social Security Administration et al
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: After a de novo review of the record, the Unopposed Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 40 ) is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 31-1) is DENIED. The fina l decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/31/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
SHARON DELOIS JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:13-cv-00692
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No.
40), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 31-1) be denied
and the final decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. After being granted an extension of time
until September 28, 2017 to file objections, Plaintiff did not file any. (Doc. No. 42.) After a de
novo review of the record, the Unopposed Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 40) is
ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 31-1) is DENIED.
The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?