Critter Control, Inc. v. Young

Filing 152

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On January 23, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 148 ) to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is there ACCEPTED and made the f indings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Permanent Injunction (Docket No. 136 ) is GRANTED, and the court will issue the proposed Order Granting Pe rmanent Injunction and Other Relief (Docket No. 138 ). This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case, although the court will retain jurisdiction to enforce its Permanent Injunction. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/26/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CRITTER CONTROL, INC.,
a Michigan corporation,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
CARY YOUNG, a Tennessee citizen d/b/a
Elite Critter Control,
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

Civil No. 3:13-0695
Judge Trauger
Magistrate Judge Griffin

ORDER
On January 23, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation
(Docket No. 148) to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and
Recommendation is there ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of
this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for
Permanent Injunction (Docket No. 136) is GRANTED, and the court will issue the proposed
Order Granting Permanent Injunction and Other Relief (Docket No. 138).
This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case, although the court will retain
jurisdiction to enforce its Permanent Injunction.
It is so ORDERED.
Enter this 26th day of February 2015.

________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge