Driver v. Fabish et al
Filing
264
ORDER: The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ( 261 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. It is hereb y ORDERED as follows: 1. The plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against defendant Jorge Santiago ( 231 ) is GRANTED and default judgment is hereby entered against defendant Santiago in the amount of $20,000.00. 2. The plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees ( 249 ) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff is awarded reasonable attorney's fees, to be paid by defendant Santiago, in the amount of $16,520.00. 3. The John Doe II defendant is DISMISSED from this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/17/18. (gb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DE’MARIO DRIVER,
Plaintiff,
v.
LT. FRANK FABISH, ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 3:13-cv-01087
Judge Trauger
ORDER
On March 27, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation
(Docket No. 261), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and
Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law
of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment against defendant Jorge Santiago
(Docket No. 231) is GRANTED and default judgment is hereby entered against
defendant Santiago in the amount of $20,000.00.
2.
The plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees (Docket No. 249) is
GRANTED, and the plaintiff is awarded reasonable attorney’s fees, to be paid by
defendant Santiago, in the amount of $16,520.00.
3.
The “John Doe II” defendant is DISMISSED from this case.
This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case.
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 17th day of April 2017.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?