Driver v. Fabish et al
Filing
31
ORDER: Plaintiff's requests 21 and 29 are GRANTED. Counsel for the served Defendants shall file under seal by April 25, 2014, the last known addresses for Defendants Fabish, Santiago and Lindsey. Upon the filing of these addresses, the Unite d States Marshals Service shall attempt service of process on these Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 4/10/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DE’MARIO DRIVER #417678,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v.
FRANK FABISH, et al.,
Defendants
No. 3:13-1087
Judge Trauger/Bryant
Jury Demand
O R D E R
Plaintiff Driver, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis, has filed two identical requests for addresses of
persons being subpoenaed as a witness (Docket Entry Nos. 21 and
29). From a review of these requests, the undersigned Magistrate
Judge
construes
them
as
a
request
by
Plaintiff
for
current
addresses of named Defendants who have not been served with
process. In particular, the record indicates that the summons
issued to Defendant Jorge Santiago and Frank Fabish have been
returned unexecuted marked “No longer employed” (Docket Entry Nos.
11, 12, 24 and 25). Similarly, the summons issued to Defendant
James Lindsey has been returned unexecuted with the explanation
“Addressee on FMLA/Workers Comp since May 16, 2013" (Docket Entry
No. 10 at 4).
Plaintiff’s requests (Docket Entry Nos. 21 and 29) are
GRANTED. Counsel for the served Defendants shall file under seal by
April 25, 2014, the last known addresses for Defendants Fabish,
Santiago and Lindsey. Upon the filing of these addresses, the
United States Marshals Service shall attempt service of process on
these Defendants.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/ John S. Bryant
JOHN S. BRYANT
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?