Driver v. Fabish et al

Filing 31

ORDER: Plaintiff's requests 21 and 29 are GRANTED. Counsel for the served Defendants shall file under seal by April 25, 2014, the last known addresses for Defendants Fabish, Santiago and Lindsey. Upon the filing of these addresses, the Unite d States Marshals Service shall attempt service of process on these Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 4/10/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DE’MARIO DRIVER #417678, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff v. FRANK FABISH, et al., Defendants No. 3:13-1087 Judge Trauger/Bryant Jury Demand O R D E R Plaintiff Driver, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed two identical requests for addresses of persons being subpoenaed as a witness (Docket Entry Nos. 21 and 29). From a review of these requests, the undersigned Magistrate Judge construes them as a request by Plaintiff for current addresses of named Defendants who have not been served with process. In particular, the record indicates that the summons issued to Defendant Jorge Santiago and Frank Fabish have been returned unexecuted marked “No longer employed” (Docket Entry Nos. 11, 12, 24 and 25). Similarly, the summons issued to Defendant James Lindsey has been returned unexecuted with the explanation “Addressee on FMLA/Workers Comp since May 16, 2013" (Docket Entry No. 10 at 4). Plaintiff’s requests (Docket Entry Nos. 21 and 29) are GRANTED. Counsel for the served Defendants shall file under seal by April 25, 2014, the last known addresses for Defendants Fabish, Santiago and Lindsey. Upon the filing of these addresses, the United States Marshals Service shall attempt service of process on these Defendants. It is so ORDERED. /s/ John S. Bryant JOHN S. BRYANT United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?