Sevier v. Hewlett Packard

Filing 3

ORDER: The plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of four hundred dollars ($400.00) or submit a signed statement setting forth with specificity the sources and amoun ts of any income, benefits, or assets he used to support himself for the prior twelve month period. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/17/13. (xc:Pro se party via e-mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CHRIS SEVIER Plaintiff, ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] v. HEWLETT PACKARD Defendant. No. 3:13-1099 Judge Sharp O R D E R The Court has before it a pro se complaint (Docket Entry No.1) under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No.2). The plaintiff is a resident of Nashville. According to his application, he has had no income or benefits for the past twelve months. The plaintiff has neglected to provide information, however, showing how he has been supporting himself. The Court, therefore, is unable to rule upon his application at this time. Accordingly, the plaintiff is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of four hundred dollars ($400.00) or submit a signed statement setting forth with specificity the sources and amounts of any income, benefits, or assets he used to support himself for the prior twelve month period. The plaintiff is forewarned that, should he fail to comply with these instructions within the specified period of time, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis. It is so ORDERED. ____________________________ Kevin H. Sharp United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?