Wynn et al v. Five Star Quality Care Trust et al
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Motion for Leave to File Surreply and for Court to Retain Class/Collective Specific Claims. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/11/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
LASHIKA WYNN, RONETRA ANTWINE,
BERNITA BOOKER, RAMONA WURM
ANNIE RIDLEY, MICHELLE WILLIAMS,
On behalf of themselves and
Others Similarly Situated
v.
FIVE STAR QUALITY CARE and
MORNINGSIDE OF BELMONT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Motion GRANTED.
Hon. Judge Trauger
3:13-cv-01338
JURY DEMAND
PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY AND
(ALTERNATIVE) MOTION FOR COURT TO RETAIN CLASS/COLLECTIVE
SPECIFIC CLAIMS
Plaintiffs respectfully requests that the Court afford it leave to file the attached sur-reply
in clarification and opposition to Defendants Reply (to Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to
Defendants Motion to Compel) filed on March 5, 2014. Defendants raised several inaccurate
statements of law and fact of matters of grave concern; particularly with regard to Defendants
claim of a burden to Plaintiffs. Plaintiff would like the opportunity to reply to the arguments
raised by Defendants and draw the Court attention to the correct and applicable legal authorities,
especially in relation to the complex facts of this matter.
Additionally, Plaintiffs respectfully requests that the Court grant its Motion to Retain
Plaintiffs’ Class/Collective-Specific Claims. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum
of Law (included within the Sur-Reply), Plaintiffs ask the Court to grant their, in the alternative,
motion if necessary.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully requests that the Court grant leave to file the attached
Sur-Reply and accept their Memorandum of Law (filed collectively).
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?