Hopper v. Trimble County Police

Filing 2

ORDER: The Court has before it a pro se prisoner petition (Docket Entry No. 1 ) for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is hereby GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk will provide the petitioner with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of Administrative Order No. 93. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/30/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TERRY W. HOPPER Petitioner, v. TRIMBLE COUNTY POLICE Respondent. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] GENERAL DOCKET No. 3:13-mc-0088 Judge Campbell O R D E R The Court has before it a pro se prisoner petition (Docket Entry No.1) for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner has neglected, however, to either pay the fee required for the filing of the petition or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the petitioner is hereby GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk will provide the petitioner with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of Administrative Order No. 93. The petitioner is forewarned that, should he fail to comply with these instructions within the specified period of time, the Court will presume that he is not interested in pursuing this matter and will dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. It is so ORDERED. ______________________________ Todd Campbell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?