Adams v. Woodall et al

Filing 120

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 114 ), to which no Objections have been filed. Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time to file Obj ections to this Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 119 ). Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time is DENIED. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accor dingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 80 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff is not entitled to preliminary injunctive relief under the circumstances of this case. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/17/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS
v.
JASON WOODALL, et al.

)
)
) NO. 3-14-0020
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 114), to which no Objections have been filed. Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Enlargement of
Time to file Objections to this Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 119). Plaintiff’s Motion
for Enlargement of Time is DENIED.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and
Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 80) is DENIED.1 Plaintiff is not entitled
to preliminary injunctive relief under the circumstances of this case.
There is another Report and Recommendation pending in this case (Docket No. 116). The
Court will give Plaintiff additional time to respond to that Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff
shall file any Objections to that Report and Recommendation by March 31, 2015. Defendants shall
have until April 17, 2015, to file any Response to Plaintiff’s Objections.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum (Docket No. 87)
has already been denied by the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 88).