Reid v. Vericrest Financial

Filing 19

ORDER: Bench Trial set for 2/10/2015 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Pretrial Conference set for 1/27/2015 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 1/16/2015. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/16/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 3/27/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ELYSIE J. REID ) ) ) ) ) v. VERICREST FINANCIAL Civil Action No. 3:14-0069 Judge Sharp/Knowles O R D E R In a previous Order, this case was set for a bench trial on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, beginning at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Kevin H. Sharp. Docket No. 16. The final pretrial conference is set for January 27, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Knowles, in Courtroom 661, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee, 37203. All litigants who will participate in the trial must attend the Final Pretrial Conference. Litigants shall submit a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order to the Court by January 16, 2015. The Pretrial Order shall contain: (1) a recitation that the pleadings are amended to conform to the Pretrial Order and that the Pretrial Order supplants the pleadings; (2) a statement of the basis for jurisdiction in this Court; (3) a short summary of the Plaintiff’s theory (no more than one page); (4) a short summary of the Defendant’s theory (no more than one page); (5) a statement of the issues;(6) a succinct statement of the relief sought; (7) a summary of any anticipated evidentiary disputes; and (8) an estimate of the anticipated length of the trial. The parties shall also submit to the Court by January 16, 2015, the following: (1) witness lists in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3); (2) exhibit lists in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3); and (3) stipulations. By January 6, 2015, the parties shall file any motions in limine and any motions objecting to expert testimony. Any responses to such motion shall be filed by January 16, 2015. Expert witness disclosures shall be made timely in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) or as otherwise ordered by the Court. Expert witness disclosure statements shall not be supplemented after the applicable disclosure deadline, absent leave of Court. No expert witness shall testify beyond the scope of his or her expert witness disclosure statement. The Court may exclude the testimony of an expert witness, or order other sanctions, for violation of expert witness disclosure requirements or deadlines. The shall be no rebuttal expert witnesses, absent leave of Court. Responses to interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admissions shall be supplemented timely, if necessary, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) no later than thirty (30) days before trial, absent leave of Court. The Court may exclude evidence or order other sanctions, for violation of a duty or deadline to supplement discovery responses. By January 16, 2015, the parties shall file briefs on the types of damages recoverable, and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. At the Final Pretrial Conference, litigants shall be prepared to: (1) identify and discuss undisputed facts and issues; (2) discuss the status of discovery; (3) preview proposed testimony; (4) discuss expert testimony; (5) preview proposed exhibits; (6) discuss motions in limine; (7) discuss pretrial briefs; and (8) discuss settlement. Pre-trial briefs shall be filed seven (7) working days prior to trial. There shall be no motions to continue filed after the date of the Final Pretrial Conference absent extraordinary circumstances. IT IS SO ORDERED. _____________________________ E. CLIFTON KNOWLES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?