Maisano v. Modrzejewski et al

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter assign a civil action number. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/13/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DALE MAISANO,
v.
NURSE PRACTIONER JOHN
MODRZEJEWSKI et al.

)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:14-mc-0007
Judge Sharp

ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Dale Maisano has filed a photocopied one-page complaint in which he alleges only
that “All Defendants are fully aware They are interfering with prescribed treatment. . . . All Defendants
refuse my colonoscopy as ordered.” (ECF No. 1.) He claims this failure places him in “imminent danger,”
and he seeks damages in the amount of “Ten Trillion Dollars U.S.” (Id.)
The plaintiff is barred by 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g) from proceeding in forma pauperis. He did not
submit the $400.00 filing fee with his complaint, and he does not plausibly allege that he is in imminent
danger of serious physical injury. Moreover, the complaint is not in compliance with the Order and
Restraining Order entered by Senior United States District Judge Stephen M. McNamee on August 11,
1992 in an unsuccessful attempt to curtail the plaintiff=s voluminous frivolous filings. Among other things,
Judge McNamee=s order enjoins Maisano from filing any civil action in the United States District Court for
the District of Arizona, or any other federal court, without first obtaining leave of the court. See Maisano v.
Lewis, CIV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS) (D. Ariz. Aug. 11, 1992) (Order and Restraining Order).
Pursuant to the Restraining Order, any A[f]ailure to comply strictly with [its] terms . . . will be
sufficient ground to deny leave to file.@ Id. Because the plaintiff made no attempt with his current filing to
comply with the Restraining Order, the present complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appeal of this order would not be in good faith, and the Court will not grant leave to appeal in forma
pauperis.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter assign a civil action number to this case, to enter judgment and
to close the case, in accordance with Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P.
It is so ORDERED.

Kevin H. Sharp
United States District Judge