Maisano v. Corizon Heath Inc.
Filing
3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter assign a civil action number. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/13/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DALE MAISANO,
v.
CORIZON HEALTH INC.
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:14-mc-0016
Judge Sharp
ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Dale Maisano has filed yet another photocopied, one-page complaint alleging only
that ACorizon Health Inc. is fully aware the food I=m given daily is making me quite ill. Pure torture as in
Wal-Mart v. Duke, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011). They are fully aware I=m claiming Medical Malpractice & RICO
Daily.@ (ECF No. 1.) He seeks injunctive relief and damages in the amount of AOne Trillion Dollars U.S.@
(Id.)
The plaintiff is barred by 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g) from proceeding in forma pauperis. He did not
submit the $400.00 filing fee with his complaint, and he does not plausibly allege that he is in imminent
danger of serious physical injury. Moreover, the complaint is not in compliance with the Order and
Restraining Order entered by Senior United States District Judge Stephen M. McNamee on August 11,
1992 in an unsuccessful attempt to curtail the plaintiff=s voluminous frivolous filings. Among other things,
Judge McNamee=s order enjoins Maisano from filing any civil action in the United States District Court for
the District of Arizona, or any other federal court, without first obtaining leave of the court. See Maisano v.
Lewis, CIV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS) (D. Ariz. Aug. 11, 1992) (Order and Restraining Order).
Pursuant to the Restraining Order, any A[f]ailure to comply strictly with [its] terms . . . will be
sufficient ground to deny leave to file.@ Id. Because the plaintiff made no attempt with his current filing to
comply with the Restraining Order, the present complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appeal of this order would not be in good faith, and the Court will not grant leave to appeal in forma
pauperis.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter assign a civil action number to this case, to enter judgment and
to close the case, in accordance with Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P.
It is so ORDERED.
Kevin H. Sharp
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?