Operating Engineers Local Union No. 474 Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Bell Crane & Rigging, Inc.
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND WAIVING BOND. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/16/14. (xc: Defendant Bell Crane & Rigging, Inc. by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION NO.
474 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND,
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION
NO. 474 PENSION FUND, and OPERATING
ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION NO. 474
APPRENTICESHIP FUND,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BELL CRANE & RIGGING, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 3:14cv244
Judge Trauger
Magistrate JudgeGriffin
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND WAIVING BOND
Pending before the Court is a motion by Plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction and to waive
any requirement for security in connection with issuance of the preliminary injunction.
Defendant has not responded to the motion, and pursuant to Local Rule 8(b)(3) the failure to file a
response indicates there is no opposition.
Despite the lack of opposition, the Court has
considered the motion and the entire record in this matter, and makes the following findings.
The motion is supported by the declaration of Angela Nelson who relates under penalty of
perjury as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that factual statements in her declaration are true. The
declaration establishes the following: Plaintiffs are multiemployer employee welfare benefit
plans as that term is defined in ERISA at 29 U.S.C. §1002 (1). Defendant Bell Crane & Rigging,
Inc. is a party to a collective bargaining requiring the payment of contributions to Plaintiffs, and is
an employer as that term is defined in ERISA at 29 U.S.C. 1002 (5). Under terms of the collective
bargaining agreement, Defendant is obligated to send Plaintiffs a monthly payroll report with
{003017/10210/00325049.DOCX / Ver.1}
details about the hours of work and wages of its employees and the report is to be accompanied
with payment of contributions.
Plaintiffs filed suit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1145, which was added to ERISA in 1980 due
to the Congressional recognition that delinquencies of employers in making required contributions
in a timely fashion impose a variety of costs to health and pension plans, including the loss of
funds to pay benefits, interest income, additional administrative expenses, attorney’s fees and
other legal costs, and also the possibility that employees may not receive health or pension
benefits. 1
Consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction requires weighing the
interests of Plaintiffs and Defendant upon the consideration of four factors: (1) whether there is a
strong or substantial likelihood of Plaintiffs’ success on the merits; (2) whether an injunction will
save Plaintiffs from irreparable injury; (3) whether an injunction will harm others, including
Defendant; and (4) the impact the Court’s ruling will have upon the public interest. Dayton Area
Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. Fischer, 70 F.3d 1474, 1480 (6th Cir.) cert. den. 517 U.S. 1135
(1996). These factors are to be balanced and do not receive rigid application or an assignment of
equal weight. (Ibid).
Because uncontested facts as stated in the Nelson declaration establish Defendant violated
29 U.S.C. § 1145, there is a strong or substantial likelihood of Plaintiffs’ success on the merits.
Issuance of the injunction will likely save Plaintiffs from irreparable injury, as the Nelson
declaration reveals that absent the payment of contributions, employees of Defendant may not
receive health, pension, and other benefits. Issuance of the injunction will not harm others, as
1
Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, S1076 - The Multiemployer
Pension Plan Act Amendments of 1980, Summary and Analysis of Consideration 96th Cong., 2d
Sess. at 43-4 (Comm. Print, 1980).
{003017/10210/00325049.DOCX / Ver.1}
Defendant will merely be required to conform its conduct to §515 of ERISA. The public interest
embodied in §515 of ERISA will be served by issuance of the injunction.
Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 (a) the Court hereby enters a preliminary
injunction against the Defendant requiring the timely future payment of contributions and
submission of all monthly payroll reports, as required under 29 U.S.C. § 1145. All payments
presently owing and all payroll reports presently due shall be submitted to Plaintiffs within twenty
(20) days of the date of entry of this order.
Plaintiffs have also moved to waive any requirement for security in connection with
issuance of the preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed. Civ. R. P. 65(c). For reasons stated in
Plaintiffs’ memorandum in support, the Motion is hereby granted and bond is hereby waived.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Defendant Bell Crane & Rigging,
Inc., P.O. Box 1505, Richmond Hill, GA 31324.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
United States District Judge
{003017/10210/00325049.DOCX / Ver.1}
APPROVED FOR ENTRY:
s/R. Jan Jennings
_
R. Jan Jennings, BPR No. 1536
Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, PLLC
227 Second Avenue North, 4th Floor
Nashville, TN 37201-1631
Tel.: (615) 254-8801
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing has been served via United States First
Class Mail with adequate postage affixed thereon to the following:
Bell Crane & Rigging, Inc.
P.O. Box 1505
Richmond Hill, GA 31324
This 13th day of June, 2014.
s/R. Jan Jennings
R. Jan Jennings
{003017/10210/00325049.DOCX / Ver.1}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?