Wood v. Sehorn et al
Filing
58
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time 54 and Motion for Appointment of Counsel 55 are referred to the Magistrate Judge for decision. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Declarations, and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and a Temporary Restraining Order 33 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/25/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JAMES L. WOOD
v.
DAVID SEHORN, et al.
)
)
) NO. 3-14-0617
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 48). Since the filing of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has filed a letter to the Court
(Docket No. 50), three Declarations (Docket Nos. 53, 56 and 57), a Motion for Extension of Time
(Docket No. 54) and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 55).
The Motion for Extension of Time (Docket No. 54) and Motion for Appointment of Counsel
(Docket No. 55) are referred to the Magistrate Judge for decision.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Declarations, and the
file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and a Temporary Restraining
Order (Docket No. 33) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?