Davis et al v. Patel et al
Filing 47
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ADOPTS in part the Report and Recommendation that Plaintiffs are not entitled to enterprise coverage under the FLSA, do not produce goods for interstate commerce, and are not engaged in commerce when performing housekeeping and maintenance duties. Yet, because the Court concludes that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Plaintiffs' front desk activities qualify them as engaged in commerce, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 20 ) is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 5/21/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
