Tankesly v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Filing 168

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the following are hereby ORDERED: 1. The Motion fo r Judgment Upon the Pleadings filed by Defendants Damon Hiniger and Dr. Jose Garriga (DE # 106 ) is GRANTED; 2. All federal claims against all defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. The District Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdicti on over the Plaintiff's state law claims; 4. This case is dismissed without prejudice as to whatever relief to which the Plaintiff may be entitled in state court on his state law claims; 5. This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case ; 6. All pending motions are hereby terminated as moot. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/10/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

CALVIN TANKESLY, JR. #90944

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF
AMERICA, ET AL.
Defendants.

Civil No. 3:14-cv-00911
Judge Trauger

ORDER
On June 9, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #145),
to which no timely objections have been filed. The court has granted to the Plaintiff three
extensions of time within which to file objections. (See Docket Nos. 152, 157, 163). The last
extension order required that objections be filed by September 8, 2015; no such objections have
been filed.
The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact
and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the following are hereby
ORDERED:
1.

The Motion for Judgment Upon the Pleadings filed by Defendants Damon Hiniger

and Dr. Jose Garriga (DE #106) is GRANTED;
2.

All federal claims against all defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

3.

The District Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the

Plaintiff’s state law claims;

4.

This case is dismissed without prejudice as to whatever relief to which the

Plaintiff may be entitled in state court on his state law claims;
5.

This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case;

6.

All pending motions are hereby terminated as moot.

It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 10th day of September 2015.

________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge