O Corp Corporation et al v. Royal Appliance Mfg. Company et al

Filing 21

ORDER: The Appellants' Motion For Leave to File Reply to Appellees' Sur-Reply is GRANTED, but its request for oral argument, contained within the same filing 20 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/20/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

O CORP CORPORATION, f/k/a Oreck
Corporation, and O MERCHANDISING, LLC,
f/k/a Oreck Merchandising, LLC,
Appellants,
v.
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. COMPANY, and
OAC ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC,
Appellees.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 3:14-1061
Judge Trauger

ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the Appellants’ Motion For Leave to File Reply to
Appellees’ Sur-Reply is GRANTED, but its request for oral argument, contained within the
same filing (Docket No. 20), is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 20th day of August 2014.

________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge