Bostic v. Biggs et al

Filing 153

ORDER: For these reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's sec ond Motion to Amend his complaint (Docket No. 74) is DENIED. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the originalreferral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/8/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JAMES E. BOSTIC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SHARA BIGGS, ET AL., Civil No. 3:14-cv-01068 Judge Trauger Defendant. ORDER On August 8, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 131), to which the plaintiff filed two documents in response (Docket Nos. 145, 146). The court originally interpreted these documents as objections to the Report and Recommendation, and Responses were filed (Docket Nos. 150, 151). In fact, in both of these documents, the plaintiff agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny his second Motion to Amend his complaint (Docket No. 74). For these reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s second Motion to Amend his complaint (Docket No. 74) is DENIED. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. The court notes that, among other pending matters, a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, on March 23, 2016 (Docket No. 105) is still pending. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 8th day of September 2016. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?