Eidson v. Weatherford et al

Filing 11

ORDER: The respondent shall file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the petition in conformance with Rule 5, Rules --- § 2254 Cases, within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this order on the docket. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order by mail on the respondent and the Attorney General of Tennessee. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/12/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail) (xc: Petition & Order sent to Respondents & TN Attorney General via regular mail) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION GREGORY STEPHEN EIDSON Petitioner, ] ] ] ] ] ] ] v. SONNY WEATHERFORD, et al. Respondents. No. 3:14-1408 Judge Sharp O R D E R The Court is in receipt of a pro se prisoner petition (Docket Entry No.1) under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, for writ of habeas corpus. The Court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition and finds that the petitioner has stated a colorable claim for relief. Rule 4, Rules --- § 2254 Cases. Accordingly, the respondent shall file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the petition in conformance with Rule 5, Rules --- § 2254 Cases, within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this order on the docket. The response shall state whether this case is a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(3)(A). The respondent shall also address the question of whether the petition is timely. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order by mail on the respondent and the Attorney General of Tennessee. Rule 4, Rules --- § 2254 Cases. It is so ORDERED. ____________________________ Kevin H. Sharp United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?