Hobson v. Hagel

Filing 245

JUDGMENT: This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict as reflected in the verdict form filed on September 28, 2017. (Docket No. 239). The jury found that plaintiff did not p rove by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant retaliated against plaintiff in not selecting her for the 0310, Secondary English Position posted at RPA No. 13JUN7XHEKY015490 and the 0310, English Position posted at, RPA No. 13JUL7XHEKY019211. Signed by Katheryn Beasley Deputy Clerk for Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/2/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, NASHVILLE DIVISION JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE FAYE RENELL HOBSON, VS. RETIRED GENERAL JAMES MATTIS, Secretary, Department of Defense ) ) ) CASE #: 3:14-1540 ) ) ) " Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict as reflected in the verdict form filed on September 28, 2017. (Docket No. 239). The jury found that plaintiff did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant retaliated against plaintiff in not selecting her for the 0310, Secondary English Position posted at RPA No. 13JUN7XHEKY015490 and the 0310, English Position posted at, RPA No. 13JUL7XHEKY019211. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. KEITH THROCKMORTON, CLERK DATE: October 2, 2017 /s/ Katheryn Beasley BY KATHERYN BEASLEY DEPUTY CLERK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?