Maisano v. Modrzejewski et al
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Because the plaintiff made no attempt with his current filing to comply with the Restraining Order, the present complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appeal of this order would not be in good faith, and the Court will not grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/25/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (ds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DALE MAISANO,
Plaintiff,
v.
NP JOHN MODRZEJEWSKI et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:14-cv-01699
Judge Campbell
ORDER
The complaint in this case was filed in an improper venue, is frivolous and fails to comply with the
Order and Restraining Order entered by Senior United States District Judge Stephen M. McNamee on August
11, 1992. See Maisano v. Lewis, CIV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS) (D. Ariz. Aug. 11, 1992) ( Restraining Order).
Pursuant to the Restraining Order, any “[f]ailure to comply strictly with [its] terms . . . will be sufficient ground
to deny leave to file.” Id. Because the plaintiff made no attempt with his current filing to comply with the
Restraining Order, the present complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appeal of this order would not be in good faith, and the Court will not grant leave to appeal in forma
pauperis.
It is so ORDERED.
This is the final judgment in this action, for purposes of Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P.
Todd Campbell
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?