Nexpay Inc v. Comdata Network Inc
Filing
158
ORDER: The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ( 138 ), objections to which have been withdrawn ( 154 ). The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the r easons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Comdata's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Counterclaim Without Prejudice ( 119 ) is GRANTED, with the understanding that the parties have represented to the court that Comdata has satisfied whate ver fees and costs were required to be paid pursuant to the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall term the Motion for De Novo Review of Report and Recommendation ( 139 ), as it has been withdrawn ( 154 ). Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/20/17. (gb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
NEXPAY, INC.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
COMDATA NETWORK, INC.,
Defendant.
Civil No. 3:14-cv-1749
Judge Trauger
ORDER
On October 6, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation
(DE #138), objections to which have been withdrawn (Docket No. 154). The Report and
Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law
of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Comdata’s Motion
to Voluntarily Dismiss Counterclaim Without Prejudice (Docket No. 119) is GRANTED, with
the understanding that the parties have represented to the court that Comdata has satisfied
whatever fees and costs were required to be paid pursuant to the Report and Recommendation.
The Clerk shall term the Motion for De Novo Review of Report and Recommendation
(Docket No. 139), as it has been withdrawn (Docket No. 154).
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 20th day of December 2017.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?