Nexpay Inc v. Comdata Network Inc

Filing 158

ORDER: The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ( 138 ), objections to which have been withdrawn ( 154 ). The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the r easons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Comdata's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Counterclaim Without Prejudice ( 119 ) is GRANTED, with the understanding that the parties have represented to the court that Comdata has satisfied whate ver fees and costs were required to be paid pursuant to the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall term the Motion for De Novo Review of Report and Recommendation ( 139 ), as it has been withdrawn ( 154 ). Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/20/17. (gb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION NEXPAY, INC., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. COMDATA NETWORK, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 3:14-cv-1749 Judge Trauger ORDER On October 6, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #138), objections to which have been withdrawn (Docket No. 154). The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that Comdata’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Counterclaim Without Prejudice (Docket No. 119) is GRANTED, with the understanding that the parties have represented to the court that Comdata has satisfied whatever fees and costs were required to be paid pursuant to the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall term the Motion for De Novo Review of Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 139), as it has been withdrawn (Docket No. 154). It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 20th day of December 2017. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?