Nexpay Inc v. Comdata Network Inc

Filing 225

ORDER granting 216 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/13/18. (gb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
NEXPAY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMDATA NETWORK, INC., d/b/a
COMDATA CORP.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Motion GRANTED.

No. 3:14-cv-01749
Judge Trauger
Magistrate Judge Newbern

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Pursuant to Section IV(B)(5) of the Agreed Protective Order (Doc. 34), Defendant
Comdata Network, Inc. n/k/a Comdata Inc. (“Comdata”) respectfully moves for permission to file
under seal Comdata’s Reply in Further Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.
Comdata’s Reply cites and quotes, among other things:
1. Plaintiff’s Response Brief (Doc. 207);
2. Plaintiff’s Response to Comdata’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (Doc.
208);
3. The Declaration of Vincent Valentine (Doc. 209); and
4. Plaintiff’s Appendix of deposition exhibits (Doc. 212).
Each of the above documents has been filed under seal and without a redacted version for
public view. (See Doc. 204, Pl.’s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal; Doc. 213, Order; see also
Doc. 197, Order granting motion to cite deposition transcripts under seal.) Comdata so frequently
cites or references the above in its Reply that any redacted version would be of no substantive
value.