Loyde v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Filing 154

ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court has reviewed the record in this case de novo and finds that the defendants' timely Objections (Docket Entry No. 131 ) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Re commendation (Docket Entry No. 113 ) lack merit. Therefore, the defendants' Objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED in all respects. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 61 ) is hereby DENIED. This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further pre-trial consideration. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/21/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MACK MANDRELL LOYDE Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] No. 3:14-1754 Judge Trauger ORDER In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court has reviewed the record in this case de novo and finds that the defendants’ timely Objections (Docket Entry No. 131) to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 113) lack merit. Therefore, the defendants’ Objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED in all respects. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 61) is hereby DENIED. This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further pre-trial consideration. It is so ORDERED. _________________________ Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?