Fisher v. United States Marshal Service et al

Filing 58

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 54 ) is hereb y ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/1/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOHN FISHER, JR., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 3:14-cv-1795 Judge Sharp ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 54), recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rules 4(m) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Neither party has filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R & R. Where no objections are made to the R & R, “[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 54) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 1 The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. _________________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?