Turner v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having considered the matter de novo in accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, (1) the Report and Recommendation (D ocket No. 18 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (3) the Court hereby CERTIFIES that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/18/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CLYDE TURNER, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:14-1810 Judge Sharp ORDER Magistrate Judge Brown has issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 18) in which he recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey court Orders. He also recommends that any appeal not be certified as taken in good faith. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, despite being specifically informed of his opportunity to do so. Having considered the matter de novo in accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, (1) the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 18) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (3) the Court hereby CERTIFIES that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?