Wells v. Schofield

Filing 54

ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation 42 is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 4 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/29/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

JOHN C. WELLS, III
v.
DERRICK SCHOFIELD.

)
)
) NO. 3-14-1913
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)

ORDER
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 42) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 50 and 51).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the
Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The
Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and
approved.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Docket
No. 4) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE