Williams v. Town of Smyrna, Tennessee et al
Filing
72
ORDER: For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum filed contemporaneously herewith, the Court rules as follows: (1) Defendant Town of Smyrna's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED, (Docket No. 36); (2) Defendant Officer Godby' s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED in regards to Plaintiff Williams' negligent infliction of emotional distress claim and DENIED in regards to Plaintiff Williams' Fourth Amendment and false imprisonment claims, (Docket No. 33); (3) Any of Plaintiff Williams' claims relying on a Fourteenth Amendment analysis separate from a Fourth Amendment analysis are hereby DISMISSED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/14/17. (af)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
LASHAWN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
TOWN OF SMYRNA, TENNESSEE,
and DON GODBY, Officer of Smyrna,
Tennessee Police Department,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:14-cv-1965
Judge Sharp
ORDER
For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum filed contemporaneously herewith, the
Court rules as follows:
(1) Defendant Town of Smyrna’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED,
(Docket No. 36);
(2) Defendant Officer Godby’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED in
regards to Plaintiff Williams’ negligent infliction of emotional distress claim and
DENIED in regards to Plaintiff Williams’ Fourth Amendment and false imprisonment
claims, (Docket No. 33);
(3) Any of Plaintiff Williams’ claims relying on a Fourteenth Amendment analysis
separate from a Fourth Amendment analysis are hereby DISMISSED.
It is SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?