Key v. Metro Police Dept. of Davidson County, et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 19 Motion to Dismiss; denying 22 Motion to Stay; adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/2/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CLINTON KEY, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER R. COTE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:14-2002 Judge Sharp ORDER Magistrate Judge Brown has entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No. 19), recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be granted, that this case be dismissed with prejudice, and that the Court not certify any appeal as taken in good faith. Plaintiff has not responded to the R & R. Having considered the matter de novo in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, (1) The R & R (Docket No. 28) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed With Stay (Docket No. 22) (which in actuality is a response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss) is hereby DENIED; (4) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (5) Any appeal WOULD NOT be taken in good faith. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?