Smith v. State of Tenn. et al
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 35 ), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Baltimore's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 18 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, and Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/11/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JOSHUA E. SMITH
v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al.
)
)
) NO. 3-14-2003
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 35), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.
Accordingly, Defendant Baltimore’s1 Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 18) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, and Plaintiff’s state law claims are
DISMISSED without prejudice.
Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.
This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Defendants State of Tennessee, Metro Police Department South Precinct, and
General Sessions Court were dismissed by prior Order of the Court. Docket No. 7. There is no
record that Defendants Korener and Ransom have been served.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?