Shelton v. Bank of America N.A.
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 38 Report and Recommendation: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 27 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/27/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
LORI ANN SHELTON
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
)
)
) NO. 3-14-2335
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
ORDER
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 38), Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 42), and a Response filed by the Defendant
(Docket No. 45).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the
Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, the Response, and the
file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted
and approved.
Plaintiff’s Objections do not show that the decisions of the Magistrate Judge were incorrect.
Despite her alleged unfortunate, even tragic, circumstances, Plaintiff has failed to set forth claims
upon which relief may be granted in this action.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 27) is GRANTED, and this action
is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close
the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?