Shanks v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 21 ) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Re port and Recommendation is ADOPTED.Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14 ) is DENIED and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/31/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JUDY DARLENE SHANKS, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:14-cv-02342 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 21.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?