Hollis v. Howard et al

Filing 53

ORDER: Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 33 and Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply 42 . Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Reply attached to the Request (Docket No. 42-1). The referral of dispositive motions to the Magistrate Judge is revoked. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants Motion to Dismiss 33 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other p ending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/20/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

HORACE E. HOLLIS
v.
WENDELL HOWARD, et al.

)
)
) NO. 3-14-2343
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)

ORDER
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) and
Defendants’ Request for Leave to File Reply (Docket No. 42). Defendants’ Request for Leave to
File Reply is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Reply attached to the Request (Docket
No. 42-1).
The referral of dispositive motions to the Magistrate Judge is revoked. For the reasons stated
in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) is GRANTED,
and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is
directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE