Coons v. Carpenter

Filing 3

ORDER: The petitioner is hereby GRANTED 30 days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk will provide the petitioner with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a copy of Administrative Order No. 93. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/21/14. (xc:Pro se party Order with AO NO. 93 and IFP by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JAMES GORDON COONS, II Petitioner, v. WAYNE CARPENTER, WARDEN Respondent. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] GENERAL DOCKET No. 3:14-mc-0403 Judge Trauger O R D E R The Court has before it a pro se prisoner petition (Docket Entry No.1) under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner has neglected, however, to either pay the fee required for the filing of the petition or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the petitioner is hereby GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk will provide the petitioner with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a copy of Administrative Order No. 93. The petitioner is forewarned that, should he fail to comply with these instructions within the specified period of time, the Court will presume that he is not interested in pursuing this matter and will dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. It is so ORDERED. ______________________________ Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?