Lee v. Wilson County Jail-Lebanon et al

Filing 77

ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 73), to which Plaintiff filed timely objections. (Doc. No. 76.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's objections, and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. No. 33, 36) are GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 43) is DENI ED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remaining pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This is the final order in this case. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/6/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(jw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
EARL JEROME LEE, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILSON COUNTY JAILLEBANON, et al.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:15-cv-00007
JUDGE CRENSHAW

Defendants.
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc.
No. 73), to which Plaintiff filed timely objections. (Doc. No. 76.) The Court has reviewed the
Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s objections, and conducted a de novo review of the record.
The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. No. 33, 36) are
GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 43) is DENIED. This case is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remaining pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
This is the final order in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE